From: joe rockmore (rockmore@cyladian.com)
Date: 04/04/02
At 8:34 AM -0800 4/4/02, R.V.Guha wrote: > >Having fought and lost (well, at least not won) this battle in the >context of RDF vs XML, with a bunch of Netscape's >enterprise customers, a couple of years ago, I'd like to >add my 2 cents. > >The minute the issue is framed as anything vs XML, there is >just no chance of winning. Skillions of dollars are being spent >by companies that are trying to outdo each other in professing >their devotion to XML. > >I would suggest that we need to have an elevator pitch that explains >rdf/rdfs/daml as adding semantics to XML or making it easier to >develop schemas or something like that. In my view, this is not >a misrepresentation, a clarification. > >There is an interesting talk by Hasso Plattner --- who the intended >audience will take very seriously --- where he says that xml just >provides common syntax, but we need semantics. (see ><http://news.com.com/2100-1001-869941.html>http://news.com.com/2100-1001-869941.html). >. > >guha guha...i agree, which is why i used the phrase "value added" to XML in my original posting. we should never say "DAML vs. XML" in anything related to this program; we should always talk about what DAML adds to XML that is not inherently part of XML. someone (i forgot who told me this) said to me at one of the PI meetings a good explanation that went soemthing like this: "in order to really use XML across disparate developments, you need to agree on the meaning of more than is expressible in XML (with XML schema). there are many ways to do this, and they are expressible in XML, but everyone needs to express them in the same way for interoperation. doing this is tantamount to designing DAML." if an argument like this can be sharpened, it might be what i am looking for, and maybe what david and others are saying that started this thread. -- ...joe +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=+ a. joseph rockmore, phd -|- cyladian technology consulting 873 santa cruz avenue, suite 204, menlo park, ca 94025-4629 voice 650/614-3791 -|- fax 650/326-1699 -|- cell/pager 650/714-5696 short email to cell/pager -|- <16507145696@pacbellpcs.net> web site url -|- http://www.cyladian.com +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 03/26/03 EST